Jessie Murph 1965 Full Music Video and 1:30 Disturbing

Jessie Murph, a rising voice in Gen Z pop music, has found herself at the center of an intense public backlash following the release of her music video for the single “1965.” Known for her raw lyrics and edgy aesthetics, the 20-year-old Alabama native released the track as part of her sophomore album Hysteria. However, rather than admiration, this particular song and video have ignited widespread criticism, accusations ranging from glamorizing toxic relationships to subtly pushing problematic ideologies under the guise of artistic expression.

Jessie Murph 1965 Full Music Video and 1:30 Disturbing

Contents

A Rising Star with a Provocative Edge and Full Video

Jessie Murph’s fame has been steadily growing since her breakout track “Blue Strips” and her popular duet “High Road” with Koe Wetzel. Her appeal lies in her unfiltered lyrics and unapologetic delivery traits that have resonated strongly with younger audiences. With Hysteria, she pushes even further, thematically exploring desire, gender roles, and personal struggle.

The full video of Jessie Murph is going viral worldwide at the 1:30 mark

jessie-murph-1965-full-music-video.mp4

But this time, her artistic risks may have gone too far.

“1965”: A Music Video That Takes a Dark Turn

The controversy centers on the official music video for “1965.” At first glance, the video appears to be a stylized homage to the 1960s, complete with grainy footage, beehive hairdos, and a vintage white dress. The opening scene evokes an old wedding film warm, nostalgic, and campy. Jessie stands beside her “husband” at what appears to be a family gathering, detached and calm.

Jessie Murph 1965 Full Music Video and 1:30 Disturbing

But what begins as a Pinterest-like fever dream quickly spirals into something else entirely. Around the 1:30 mark, the tone abruptly shifts. Jessie’s on-screen husband openly cheats on her, and rather than reacting, she remains still, smoking a cigarette in stoic silence. This unflinching portrayal of emotional numbness unsettled many viewers.

While not by technical standards, the depiction is raw and graphic enough that many stopped the video mid-way, questioning what they were watching. The scene did not just blur the lines between music and film it shattered them.

Lyrics That Made Fans Cringe

Beyond the visuals, “1965” raised alarms with its lyrical content. The first verse especially drew heavy criticism for appearing to trivialize domestic violence:

“I might get a little slap slap
But you wouldn’t hit me on Snapchat
Don’t f****** text me at 2am saying where you at at
Boy f*** you”

Many interpreted these lyrics as dangerously flippant, especially in the context of an ongoing public conversation about abusive relationships. Critics argued that attempting to pass these lines off as “edgy” or “Gen Z humor” contributed to the normalization of violence in romantic contexts.

TikTok and YouTube Flooded With Outrage

On YouTube, viewers filled the comment section with calls for the video to be removed. Over on TikTok, backlash was even more intense, with users dissecting both the visual and lyrical content, often using duets and stitches to express their disapproval.

Jessie Murph 1965 Full Music Video and 1:30 Disturbing

Some called the entire piece “emotionally manipulative,” while others suggested it exploited serious themes like infidelity and abuse for the sake of artistic provocation.

One particularly viral TikTok criticized the disturbing cut in the video from a shot of a young girl to an adult scene only moments later saying: “Why the hell is Jessie Murph’s 1965 video literally have that scene?? GIRL THAT’S A CHILD??”

Jessie’s Defense: “It’s Satire”

In the wake of the controversy, Jessie took to TikTok to defend herself. In a video addressing critics, she exclaimed:

“The whole song is satire. Are y’all stupid?”

She later commented beneath the post, “For legal reasons, this is satire, I promise,” referencing legal disclaimers often associated with provocative art.

However, many fans and media critics found her defense lacking. They argued that if satire isn’t clearly communicated within the work itself, labeling it afterward doesn’t count. As one social media user pointed out:

“If you need to declare it satire after people get offended, maybe it wasn’t apparent.”

Another added:

“Satire is not a get-out-of-jail-free card.”

A Performance That Didn’t Help

Hoping perhaps to reshape the narrative, Jessie performed “1965” live on The Tonight Show Starring Jimmy Fallon. Unlike the video, the live performance was stripped-down: no provocative scenes, just Jessie singing solo on stage while a ballet dancer moved in the background.

Jessie Murph 1965 Full Music Video and 1:30 Disturbing

Despite being far more PG, the performance failed to win back the public. Critics argued the emotionless delivery and vague choreography did little to clarify her artistic intent. Many described it as “tonally confusing” and “conceptually hollow.”

A viral post on X (formerly Twitter) remarked:

“Whether explicit or censored, this song just doesn’t land. The live version made it worse.”

Romanticizing a Repressive Past?

Another layer of controversy stems from the video’s visual homage to the 1960s. While the style and setting may have seemed aesthetically pleasing, critics warned that the video risked glamorizing an era marked by racial segregation, rigid gender roles, and social oppression.

One comment stated:

“This doesn’t feel like satire. It feels like a nostalgic tribute to an era that oppressed people like me.”

The blurred message, they argued, failed to challenge those repressive elements and instead presented them with a glossy, almost desirable finish.

A Broader Debate on Artistic Responsibility

Some critics took their concerns even further, accusing Jessie of inadvertently echoing far-right messaging. One TikTok user posted:

“Has anyone read the lyrics to 1965? It’s basically saying women should give up their rights. Even if it’s satire, why say this now while we’re literally fighting to keep those rights?”

In a time when reproductive freedoms and gender equality remain hotly contested issues in the United States, many felt the release of such a song was, at best, tone-deaf and at worst, harmful.

Doubts About Intent and Timing

Perhaps the most widespread criticism has been directed not at the video or lyrics themselves, but at Jessie’s response. Many questioned whether she would have ever called the work “satire” if no one had been offended. As one top-liked TikTok comment said:

“If outrage hadn’t begun, would she have labeled it satire at all?”

This perceived backpedaling has caused even some longtime fans to question her integrity as an artist.

Still Available, Still Unapologetic

Despite the outcry, “1965” remains live on all major streaming platforms, including YouTube and Spotify. Jessie Murph has not deleted or edited the video, nor has she issued a formal apology or clarification beyond her TikTok comments.

Whether this silence is a calculated artistic stance or simple defiance remains unclear. What is clear, however, is that Jessie Murph has struck a nerve and opened a broader conversation about the limits of artistic provocation, the meaning of satire, and the responsibilities artists carry in the public sphere.

Jessie Murph’s “1965” video may have been intended as a piece of provocative art, but its reception has made one thing certain: audiences demand clarity, accountability, and respect especially when difficult themes like domestic abuse and repression are involved.

The backlash has served as a reminder that bold expression comes with consequences. Whether Jessie will address these more thoughtfully in future projects remains to be seen. For now, “1965” stands as a divisive chapter in her young career one that has left both fans and critics wondering where the line between art and irresponsibility truly lies.

World News -