Lesandro Junior Guzman Feliz Full Video Resurfaces

In one of the most disturbing academic controversies in recent memory, Jessica Krug, a white Jewish woman who posed for years as a Black activist and scholar, was exposed for her decades-long racial identity fraud. But long before her confession shook academia, Krug had already courted outrage by endorsing the brutal 2018 murder of 15-year-old Lesandro “Junior” Guzman-Feliz during a Columbia University conference. Calling the teen’s death a “revolutionary moment,” Krug framed the savage machete killing as a politically justifiable act a position that many find not only deeply offensive but morally reprehensible.

Lesandro Junior Guzman Feliz Full Video Resurfaces

The Murder of Lesandro “Junior” Guzman-Feliz and Full Video

Lesandro “Junior” Guzman-Feliz was a well-liked 15-year-old boy of Dominican descent living in the Bronx. A member of the NYPD Explorers program, he aspired to become a detective and serve his community. Known for his good behavior, Junior represented the hopes of many immigrant families seeking a better future in America.

Over 2-Minute Close-Up Video of Junior Guzman Feliz Being Executed by a Gang

junior-guzman-feliz-video.mp4

Tragically, on June 20, 2018, Junior was chased down by members of the Trinitarios gang, who mistakenly identified him as a rival. The teenager sought refuge in a bodega, but surveillance footage showed the attackers dragging him outside and hacking him with machetes. The attack, recorded on CCTV, quickly went viral and sparked national outrage. The senselessness of the act, combined with the young victim’s innocence, galvanized support across New York City and beyond under the banner “Justice for Junior.”

The outpouring of grief and fury led to the conviction of five gang members who were sentenced to life in prison. At the sentencing, Junior’s mother, Leandra Feliz, told the court: “There were two deaths: Junior and I, who was left dead inside.”

Krug’s Controversial Remarks at Columbia University

Despite the well-documented facts surrounding Junior’s murder, Jessica Krug used the boy’s death as a platform to promote her radical ideology during a 2019 panel hosted by Columbia University’s Black Studies Department. Rather than condemning the attack, Krug dismissed Guzman-Feliz as a “collaborator” with police, implying that his death was justified because he was part of a system that oppressed his own community.

Lesandro Junior Guzman Feliz Full Video Resurfaces

“How many people are familiar with Lesandro Guzman-Feliz, a 15-year-old boy who was murdered in the Bronx last year?” she asked. “The narrative around it is that he was an innocent kid who was mistaken for a bad kid… but he was an Explorer, right, which is a program that the NYPD has to bring youth in to eventually work for them.”

Krug went further, comparing Junior’s murder to “necklacing,” a brutal execution tactic used in Apartheid-era South Africa to punish alleged collaborators. “That kind of violence against people who are collaborating or working against their communities we have to consider a radical moment in 2018 in which people are using machetes to hack apart a 15-year-old boy who’s working with the police.”

Perhaps most shockingly, her remarks were met with applause from the audience. No one on the panel challenged her framing of the teenager’s death as a revolutionary act. The video, later obtained by DailyMail.com, ends before any questions are asked, leaving her comments unaddressed in the moment.

The Truth About Jessica Krug

The public was shocked enough by Krug’s radical views, but the situation escalated into a full-blown scandal when she admitted in 2020 that she had been pretending to be Black for most of her adult life. In a Medium post titled “The Truth, and the Anti-Black Violence of My Lies,” Krug confessed that she had fabricated multiple racial identities over the years, including North African Blackness, U.S.-rooted Blackness, and Bronx-rooted Caribbean Blackness.

Lesandro Junior Guzman Feliz Full Video Resurfaces

“For the better part of my adult life, every move I’ve made, every relationship I’ve formed, has been rooted in the napalm toxic soil of lies,” she wrote. “I have eschewed my lived experience as a white Jewish child in suburban Kansas City under various assumed identities within a Blackness that I had no right to claim.”

Krug had styled herself as an “unrepentant and unreformed child of the hood,” cultivating an image of someone deeply connected to the struggle of marginalized communities. But in reality, she had grown up in a comfortable middle-class environment, attended private school, and cut ties with her family even skipping her mother’s funeral, reportedly to avoid being unmasked.

Academic and Public Fallout

After her admission, George Washington University, where Krug was a professor of African and Latin American studies, announced she would not be teaching in the fall. The university’s history department released a scathing statement condemning her deception: “She has betrayed the trust of countless current and former students, fellow scholars of Africana Studies, colleagues in our department and throughout the historical discipline, as well as community activists in New York City and beyond.”

The university emphasized that history is a discipline grounded in truth. Krug’s actions, they said, undermined the integrity of historical research and cast doubt on the validity of her work.

Some academics believe her confession was not born of guilt but of necessity. Hispanic scholars had reportedly been closing in on exposing her, which may have prompted her to go public before she could be outed. The timing and tone of her confession led many to question the sincerity of her remorse.

Meanwhile, Columbia University the site of her controversial remarks about Junior Guzman-Feliz did not respond to requests for comment.

The Deeper Implications

Krug’s case raises serious questions about identity, violence, and academic responsibility. Her rationalization of Junior’s murder as a political act highlights how extreme ideology can distort ethical boundaries. By portraying the killing of a child as revolutionary, she trivialized the suffering of the victim’s family and misrepresented the nature of community violence.

Her words not only dishonored Junior’s legacy but also exploited historical comparisons that were both inappropriate and inaccurate. To compare a mistaken gang murder to acts of resistance during Apartheid dilutes the real meaning of anti-colonial struggle.

Krug’s fraudulent use of Black and Hispanic identities also reveals how identity politics can be manipulated for personal advancement. She gained credibility, speaking slots, academic influence, and trust all while concealing her true background. This betrayal has damaged efforts toward racial justice by sowing distrust and diverting resources from authentic voices.

Jessica Krug’s rise and fall is a cautionary tale of deception, ideological extremism, and the misuse of academia as a platform for personal agenda. Her remarks about the murder of Lesandro “Junior” Guzman-Feliz are a stark reminder of how political rhetoric can be weaponized to excuse inexcusable violence. As institutions reckon with her legacy, they must also confront the systemic issues that allowed her to thrive unchecked.

Junior’s life full of hope, ambition, and dedication to his community deserves to be remembered not as a “revolutionary casualty” but as a tragic victim of senseless violence. No ideology should ever justify the murder of a child. And no academic should ever be applauded for suggesting otherwise.

World News -